PRAGMATIC BRANDING
Were bulls and cows able to speak English, they would be
likely to say "We do not like to be branded." Unlike their enslaved ancestors who resented
being branded, a few members of a certain African American Greek-letter
organization in the 20th century thought branding a letter on their skin was an
ultra-masculine act of love for fraternity.
We have no proof that this gesture is esteemed in our current century,
but we have ample evidence that verbal branding is pervasive in American life. It hurts.
Having a recognizable brand-name has long been a marketing
strategy in American culture, whether one is talking about canned foods,
condoms, or colleges. Thus, it is not
strange that Kelli Marshall, a teacher of film and television at DePaul
University, should seek to persuade her colleagues that "Branding Yourself
as an Academic" (Chronicle of Higher
Education, 31 Jan 2017) is a smart move.
She has a point, one that calls attention to the progressive
cheapening of intellectual standards in the Age of Trump. After noting that "branding and
marketing seem to conflict with one of the jobs of academics: to teach students
about the tricks of persuasion and to give them the language to discover what
is real," Marshall hastens to trick readers who are willing to be tricked
and who are anxious to discover what is the real road to profit in the academic
market. Her blog as an instance of
pragmatic branding would not be out of
place in the Wall Street Journal.
Those who voted for DJT got precisely what they voted
for: the disestablishment of democracy as usual. Many of us who are willing to believe that the advent of American fascism
is a temporary affair are taking vacations from reality by reading or
re-reading two novels by George Orwell ----1984
and Animal Farm --and pondering which of Umberto Eco's fourteen features of
Eternal Fascism/Ur-Fascism aptly describe our moment of discontent. For some
African Americans who can't or do not
want to forget where the branding of human beings fits in the unfolding of the
American experiment with democracy, the effort to be "woke" is
painful. We suffer the wound of knowing
what is still real and true in Michael A. Gomez's discourse on transformation
of identities in Exchanging Our Country
Marks (1998) and what is iron hot in The
Racial Contract (1997) by Charles
W. Mills, a book "dedicated to the blacks, reds, browns, and yellow who
have resisted the Racial Contract and the white renegades and race traitors who
have refused it." The final
sentence of Animal Farm is salt and
turpentine for our wound: "The creatures outside looked from pig to man,
and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible
to say which was which."
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. January 31, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment