The Tragedy of Humanistic Protest
The Chronicle of
Higher Education (online version) saturates readers with the complaints of
humanists who seem to envy the relatively "good fortunes" of their
colleagues in STEM-disciplines. For example, the historian L. D. Burnett moaned
in the August 12 issue that the public and policy makers "view the purpose
of college as purely vocational, and see humanistic inquiry -- the
study of literature, the arts, history, anthropology, philosophy -- as
a waste of time and money."
According to Burnett, it is urgent that we "defend the place of the
humanities in higher education…defend the opportunity for our students to
grapple with ideas and questions of enduring value." Do American students not deal with such ideas
and questions prior to entering colleges and universities; do they not practice critical thinking while they are
still in a state of lower education? And
if they do not, should we not ask hard questions about where waste of time and
money is actually located in American society and its forms of education? Instead of demanding that readers interrogate
(severely question) the energy-draining
tragedy of humanistic protest, CHE
and other publications broadcast the tragedy with tacit alacrity.
Perhaps this shortcoming is "normal" in the
contexts of terrorism, the expanding gap between wealth and poverty, the
banality of dying, and ecological imbalance.
Unfortunately, Burnett and some other humanists err in their annoying
protests about the legitimacy of vocation in the training of the human mind. It
is disingenuous to pretend that people who value what is practical and
necessary in the conduct of daily economic, social and cultural operations are guilty of (1) being
aliterate, (2) never having aesthetic experiences in museums and art galleries,
(3) ignoring the importance of temporal and spatial narratives, (4) dismissing
the findings of anthropology, or (5) being immune to abstract speculation. Indeed, it is fair to suspect that humanists
who traffic with such pretense are either willfully tendentious or enthralled by a tragic sense of life or both.
Job preparedness and acquiring cognitive and physical
skill-sets are not necessarily segregated from
pleasures that resist quantification. Enlightened humanists should
protest less and work harder (in concert with non-humanistic colleagues) to forge pre-future projects wherein the
humanities and the sciences cooperate in seeking the ultimate ends of human
existence.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. August 13, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment