aesthetic spins: of poetry and protest
The distinction Louise M. Rosenblatt made in The Reader, The Text, The Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work
(Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978) between aesthetic reading and efferent
reading focuses on directedness. For the
efferent reader, the main concern is acquiring information. Less concerned with utility as such, the
aesthetic reader centers "directly
on what he is living through during his relationship with that particular
text"(25). Rosenblatt constructs no
brick, iron or bamboo wall between the modes of reading, because the aesthetic
involves a degree of the efferent. Given
the difference between a cooking recipe and a poem, the efferent need not
incorporate the aesthetic. The
experience of reading
Medina, Tony,
ed. Resisting Arrest: Poems to Stretch
the Sky. Durham, NC: Jacar Press, 2016.
$19.95
and
Cushway, Philip and Michael Warr, eds. Of
Poetry and Protest: From Emmett Till to Trayvon Martin. New York: W. W. Norton, 2016. $21.95
invites vacillating
between aesthetic and efferent modes.
One might note how aesthetic spins affect the EKG of the efferent.
This note focuses only on the anthology titles and adds a
listing of the poets whose works appeared in both of the books. In the first instance, the title Resisting Arrest: Poems to Stretch the Sky provides a clever surprise. The
main title triggers ideas about antagonism between police officers and
citizens, the prison industry, and police killings as the current malady of
choice in the United States. We think of
information, as in Tony Medina's saying the poets in the book "remind us
of a universal hurt, grief, anger, rage, shame and love that we all can recall
when confronting the blunt reality and the savagery of abuses associated with
corrupted power, indifference and intolerance" (x). The subtitle might remind us, on the other
hand, of the magic of poetry, of its ability to make our minds the sky and
stretch them.
Of Poetry and Protest: From Emmett
Till to Trayvon Martin involves more unity of title and
subtitle, suggesting poetry that protests is limited to violence and
outrage. When we actually read the poems
in the anthology, we quickly discover a broader meaning of protest. If we need help, Amiri Baraka's brief essay
"Protest Poetry" (22-23) can guide us. His first sentence reads:
"I have always resented the term 'protest poetry' because it seemed to me
that it was dropping the poetry I felt closest to in a lead box so it wouldn't
contaminate the dull ass mainstream" (22). His final paragraph reads:
"So the main thrust of the term 'protest poetry' is to stigmatize the
literature that questions the given, the status quo. But wouldn't that include The Egyptian Book of the Dead, the old and new testaments of the Bible. Isn't
Revelation Protest Poetry?" (23). In the case of Baraka, I sense the
aesthetic is the efferent.
It may interest a handful of readers to know the
following poets have poems in both volumes:
Kwame Dawes/ Rita Dove/
Cornelius Eady/ Kelly Norman Ellis/ Patricia Spears Jones/ Douglas Kearney/
Yusef Komunyakaa/ Quraysh Alis Lansana/ Haki R. Madhubuti/ devorah major/
Marilyn Nelson/ Ishmael Reed/ Sonia Sanchez/ Quincy Troupe/ Frank X. Walker,
and Afaa Michael Weaver.
Noting what efferent results come from the aesthetic spins of their poems
is a timely exercise.
Jerry
W. Ward, Jr. July 28, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment